Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and expectations

Hello, and welcome to the forums at the Nautilus Drydocks, formerly Sub-driver.com!

We welcome anyone with a passion for submarines and a desire to learn and share knowledge about this fascinating hobby. Use of these forums indicates your intention to abide by our code of conduct:


1. No spam. All automated messages, advertisements, and links to competitor websites will be deleted immediately.

2. Please post in relevant sub-forums only. Messages posted in the wrong topic area will be removed and placed in the correct sub-forum by moderators.

3. Respect other users. No flaming or abusing fellow forum members. Users who continue to post inflammatory, abusive comments will be deleted from the forum after or without a warning.

4. No threats or harassment of other users will be tolerated. Any instance of threatening or harassing behavior is grounds for deletion from the forums.

5. No profanity or pornography is allowed. Posts containing adult material will be deleted.

6. No re-posting of copyrighted materials or other illegal content is allowed. Any posts containing illegal content or copyrighted materials will be deleted.
See more
See less

1/72 November?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Is that last photo a November or a 'Mo-vember'?....
    Last edited by Davidh; 07-30-2017, 04:49 AM.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by bwi 971 View Post

      You mean those stabilizer’s with integrated prop shafts? (yes I know there are dumb questions)

      Grtz,
      Bart

      Yes. I should have made that clear.

      (and like the Type-21 grand-daddy of this design I see that the two shafts will put the intersection of their thrust lines behind the boats center of gravity. Damn!)
      "... well, that takes care of Jorgenson's theory!"

      Comment


      • #63
        Morning. David I am happy you liked the stern drawing. I will dig after more material. I have no more drawings, however.

        Comment


        • #64
          Click image for larger version

Name:	18-4739293-13.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	353.6 KB
ID:	122419

          This is some more from my portfolio.

          Comment


          • #65
            Note to credit the guy hwo took hte Picture (lower left in the picute).

            Comment


            • #66
              Click image for larger version

Name:	627-November-fördäck-150626.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	381.2 KB
ID:	122422

              627 from forward.

              Comment


              • #67
                Another one of the bow.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	imageGNKAQ3M2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	285.7 KB
ID:	122424

                Comment


                • #68
                  Something on the torpedo tubes and sonar
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	627-November-150729.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	99.5 KB
ID:	122426

                  . my first pictue was too big. This one is more convenient.
                  You might have this one.

                  A comment. It seems that K-3 that was (if I am correct) retrofitted with the "balcony" type sonar got a smaller one than later boats.
                  Can anyone comment on that?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named View Post

                    Yes. I should have made that clear.

                    (and like the Type-21 g I think those stabelizers are symetrical.......please see the pictures below.......they are not widly spread on the WWW.......guys in the black limo in my sreet will go nuts.rand-daddy of this design I see that the two shafts will put the intersection of their thrust lines behind the boats center of gravity. Damn!)
                    Think you are right foil-section is not symmetrical.......think the bottom is flatter.......does that make sence?

                    Please see the pictures below.......they are not widely spread on the WWW.......those guy’s in the black limo in my street will go nuts.

                    First 2 are screenshots from a video
                    From the 4 others I adjusted te brightness and contrast to light up the contours.

                    grtz,
                    Bart
                    Click image for larger version  Name:	stabelizer 01002.jpg Views:	1 Size:	301.7 KB ID:	122428

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	stabelizer 02003.jpg Views:	1 Size:	275.8 KB ID:	122429

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	Stabilizer 04005.jpg Views:	1 Size:	664.1 KB ID:	122430

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	Stabilizer 03004.jpg Views:	1 Size:	343.9 KB ID:	122431

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	Stabilizer 05001.jpg Views:	1 Size:	369.4 KB ID:	122432


                    Click image for larger version

Name:	Stabilizer 06001.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	286.6 KB
ID:	122433




                    Last edited by bwi 971; 07-30-2017, 04:53 AM.
                    Practical wisdom is only to be learned in the school of experience.
                    "Samuel Smiles"

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Don't know where you guys dig up these photos. I always have a hard time finding good up close photos. What I really need if any of you have are up close deck photos for a Echo II. Going to do that one soon.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Don't know if they are all ECHO II maybe a few ECHO I.....think you can sort them out.

                        grtz,
                        Bart

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (1).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	382.9 KB
ID:	122443


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	417.6 KB
ID:	122444


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (4).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	412.1 KB
ID:	122445


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (3).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	418.8 KB
ID:	122446


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (6).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	285.4 KB
ID:	122447


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (5).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	451.6 KB
ID:	122448


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (9).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	224.9 KB
ID:	122449


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (10).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	330.7 KB
ID:	122450


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (12).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	298.7 KB
ID:	122451


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (11).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	426.4 KB
ID:	122452


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (13).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	372.7 KB
ID:	122453


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (7).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	408.1 KB
ID:	122454


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (8).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	263.6 KB
ID:	122455


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (14).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	248.8 KB
ID:	122456



                        Click image for larger version

Name:	675 (15).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	329.6 KB
ID:	122457


                        Practical wisdom is only to be learned in the school of experience.
                        "Samuel Smiles"

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Bart you the man. Those are Echo II pics. Those are exactly that I need. Got some nice Russian Echo II drawings a Russian sent to me. They are good but where hard to make out the details on. The pics answer my questions. I know I am going to here the guys in here grumble but I just feel the need for a 1/72 Echo II. I will do a split mold so there will be a front and rear hull. Plus guys like hardrock/Terry won't have to pay $600.00 for shipping to down under.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by 598602G View Post
                            Bart you the man. Those are Echo II pics. Those are exactly that I need. Got some nice Russian Echo II drawings a Russian sent to me. They are good but where hard to make out the details on. The pics answer my questions. I know I am going to here the guys in here grumble but I just feel the need for a 1/72 Echo II. I will do a split mold so there will be a front and rear hull. Plus guys like hardrock/Terry won't have to pay $600.00 for shipping to down under.
                            Good to hear. And Bart, Gantu and the crew keep coming up with cherry stuff from which to work. Good stuff guys -- and your good sleuthing is most appreciated.

                            Well .... two of the HEN's are covered!

                            David
                            "... well, that takes care of Jorgenson's theory!"

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by 598602G View Post
                              Bart you the man. Those are Echo II pics. Those are exactly that I need. Got some nice Russian Echo II drawings a Russian sent to me. They are good but where hard to make out the details on. The pics answer my questions. I know I am going to here the guys in here grumble but I just feel the need for a 1/72 Echo II. I will do a split mold so there will be a front and rear hull. Plus guys like hardrock/Terry won't have to pay $600.00 for shipping to down under.
                              Dude; don't make me come up there. If you do it in 1/96 there will be no need for a split mould. When will come out of the darkness? 1/96 - you know it's right.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                The NOVEMBER kit I plan to work up is 1/96.

                                So, there!

                                David
                                "... well, that takes care of Jorgenson's theory!"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X